From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Wilson

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Jan 13, 2006
162 F. App'x 791 (9th Cir. 2006)

Opinion

Submitted Jan. 9, 2006.

The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION. (See Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure Rule 36-3)

William Crowfoot, AUSA, Office of the U.S. Attorney Criminal Division, Los Angeles, CA, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Edward M. Robinson, Esq., Law Offices of Edward M. Robinson, Torrance, CA, for Defendant-Appellant.


Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California, Audrey B. Collins, District Judge, Presiding. D.C. No. CR-02-00204-ABC-3.

Before: HUG, O'SCANNLAIN and SILVERMAN, Circuit Judges.

MEMORANDUM

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

Page 792.

Brian Rhashun Wilson appeals from the 154-month sentence imposed following his guilty plea conviction for conspiracy, armed bank robbery, and use or carrying of a firearm during a crime of violence, all in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 371, 2113(a), (d), and 924(c). We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291.

Because appellant was sentenced under the then-mandatory Sentencing Guidelines, and we cannot reliably determine from the record whether the sentence imposed would have been materially different had the district court known that the Guidelines were advisory, we remand to the sentencing court to proceed pursuant to United States v. Ameline, 409 F.3d 1073, 1084-85 (9th Cir.2005) (en banc). See United States v. Moreno-Hernandez, 419 F.3d 906, 916 (9th Cir.2005).

REMANDED.


Summaries of

United States v. Wilson

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Jan 13, 2006
162 F. App'x 791 (9th Cir. 2006)
Case details for

United States v. Wilson

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff--Appellee, v. Brian Rhashun WILSON…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit

Date published: Jan 13, 2006

Citations

162 F. App'x 791 (9th Cir. 2006)