From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Wilson

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA FORT WAYNE DIVISION
Jul 19, 2018
CAUSE NO.: 1:18-CR-17-TLS-PRC (N.D. Ind. Jul. 19, 2018)

Opinion

CAUSE NO.: 1:18-CR-17-TLS-PRC

07-19-2018

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. DARLENE V. WILSON, Defendant.


FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE UPON PLEA OF GUILTY BY DEFENDANT DARLENE V. WILSON TO: THE HONORABLE THERESA L. SPRINGMANN, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

Upon Defendant Darlene V. Wilson's request to enter a plea of guilty pursuant to Rule 11 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, this matter came for hearing before Magistrate Judge Paul R. Cherry, on July 19, 2018, with the consent of Defendant Darlene V. Wilson, counsel for Defendant Darlene V. Wilson, and counsel for the United States of America.

The hearing on Defendant Darlene V. Wilson's plea of guilty was in full compliance with Rule 11, Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, before the Magistrate Judge in open court and on the record.

In consideration of that hearing and the statements made by Defendant Darlene V. Wilson under oath on the record and in the presence of counsel, the remarks of the Assistant United States Attorney and of counsel for Defendant Darlene V. Wilson,

I FIND as follows:

(1) that Defendant Darlene V. Wilson understands the nature of the charge against her to which the plea is offered;

(2) that Defendant Darlene V. Wilson understands her right to trial by jury, to persist in her plea of not guilty, to the assistance of counsel at trial, to confront and cross-examine adverse witnesses, and against compelled self-incrimination;

(3) that Defendant Darlene V. Wilson understands what the maximum possible sentence is, including the effect of the supervised release term, and Defendant Darlene V. Wilson understands that the sentencing guidelines apply and that the Court may depart from those guidelines under some circumstances;

(4) that the plea of guilty by Defendant Darlene V. Wilson has been knowingly and voluntarily made and is not the result of force or threats or of promises;

(5) that Defendant Darlene V. Wilson is competent to plead guilty;

(6) that Defendant Darlene V. Wilson understands that her answers may later be used against her in a prosecution for perjury or false statement;

(7) that there is a factual basis for Defendant Darlene V. Wilson's plea; and further,

I RECOMMEND that the Court accept Defendant Darlene V. Wilson's plea of guilty to the offense charged in Count 1 of the Indictment and that Defendant Darlene V. Wilson be adjudged guilty of the offense charged in Count 1 of the Indictment and have sentence imposed. A Presentence Report has been ordered. Should this Report and Recommendation be accepted and Defendant Darlene V. Wilson be adjudged guilty, a sentencing date before the presiding judge will be set by separate order. Objections to the Findings and Recommendation are waived unless filed and served within fourteen days. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1).

SO ORDERED this 19th day of July, 2018.

s/ Paul R. Cherry

MAGISTRATE JUDGE PAUL R. CHERRY

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT cc: Honorable Theresa L. Springmann


Summaries of

United States v. Wilson

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA FORT WAYNE DIVISION
Jul 19, 2018
CAUSE NO.: 1:18-CR-17-TLS-PRC (N.D. Ind. Jul. 19, 2018)
Case details for

United States v. Wilson

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. DARLENE V. WILSON, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA FORT WAYNE DIVISION

Date published: Jul 19, 2018

Citations

CAUSE NO.: 1:18-CR-17-TLS-PRC (N.D. Ind. Jul. 19, 2018)