From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Willis

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF GEORGIA VALDOSTA DIVISION
Nov 1, 2012
Case No. 7:12-CR-10 (HL) (M.D. Ga. Nov. 1, 2012)

Opinion

Case No. 7:12-CR-10 (HL)

11-01-2012

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, v. ANTHONY WILLIS, Defendant.


ORDER

This case is before the Court on a motion for the appointment of new counsel filed by Defendant (Doc. 33). Defendant states that he wishes to raise an ineffective assistance of counsel claim on direct appeal as to his sentencing, presumably relating to the failure of counsel to file timely sentencing objections. However, although the objections were late, the Court in the course of the sentencing hearing considered the subject matter of the objections and ruled on the objections. Thus, the objections were as a practical matter treated by the Court as if timely filed. The Court finds no reason to appoint new counsel for appeal, and accordingly, the motion is denied. John Phillip Cannon will continue to represent Defendant on appeal.

________________________

HUGH LAWSON , SENIOR JUDGE


Summaries of

United States v. Willis

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF GEORGIA VALDOSTA DIVISION
Nov 1, 2012
Case No. 7:12-CR-10 (HL) (M.D. Ga. Nov. 1, 2012)
Case details for

United States v. Willis

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, v. ANTHONY WILLIS, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF GEORGIA VALDOSTA DIVISION

Date published: Nov 1, 2012

Citations

Case No. 7:12-CR-10 (HL) (M.D. Ga. Nov. 1, 2012)