From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Williams

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Aug 28, 2013
No. 13-6450 (4th Cir. Aug. 28, 2013)

Opinion

No. 13-6450

08-28-2013

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. MICHAEL E. WILLIAMS, Defendant - Appellant.

Michael E. Williams, Appellant Pro Se. Stephen David Schiller, Assistant United States Attorney, Olivia L. Norman, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.


UNPUBLISHED

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Henry E. Hudson, District Judge. (3:03-cr-00344-HEH-1) Before GREGORY, SHEDD, and WYNN, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Michael E. Williams, Appellant Pro Se. Stephen David Schiller, Assistant United States Attorney, Olivia L. Norman, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Michael E. Williams appeals the district court's order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006) motion. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Williams, No. 3:03-cr-00344-HEH-1 (E.D. Va. Mar. 8, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED


Summaries of

United States v. Williams

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Aug 28, 2013
No. 13-6450 (4th Cir. Aug. 28, 2013)
Case details for

United States v. Williams

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. MICHAEL E. WILLIAMS…

Court:UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

Date published: Aug 28, 2013

Citations

No. 13-6450 (4th Cir. Aug. 28, 2013)