From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Williams

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
Jan 19, 2012
466 F. App'x 638 (9th Cir. 2012)

Opinion

No. 10-50453 D.C. No. 2:10-cr-00099-SJO

01-19-2012

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. JACK BENNY WILLIAMS, a.k.a. Snow, Defendant - Appellant.


NOT FOR PUBLICATION


MEMORANDUM

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.


Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Central District of California

S. James Otero, District Judge, Presiding

Before: LEAVY, TALLMAN, and CALLAHAN, Circuit Judges.

Jack Benny Williams appeals his 18-month sentence imposed for selling counterfeit currency of the United States with intent to defraud, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 473. Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), Williams's counsel has filed a brief stating there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. We have provided Williams the opportunity to file a pro se supplemental brief. No pro se supplemental brief or answering brief has been filed.

Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 80-81, 109 (1988), discloses no arguable grounds for relief on direct appeal. Counsel's motion to withdraw is GRANTED.

AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

United States v. Williams

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
Jan 19, 2012
466 F. App'x 638 (9th Cir. 2012)
Case details for

United States v. Williams

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. JACK BENNY WILLIAMS…

Court:UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

Date published: Jan 19, 2012

Citations

466 F. App'x 638 (9th Cir. 2012)