From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Williams

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Jun 22, 2022
No. 19-7858 (4th Cir. Jun. 22, 2022)

Opinion

19-7858

06-22-2022

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. DAVON STEPHON WILLIAMS, Defendant-Appellant.

Paresh S. Patel, OFFICE OF THE FEDERAL PUBLIC DEFENDER, Greenbelt, Maryland, for Appellant.


UNPUBLISHED

Submitted: March 31, 2022

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Deborah K. Chasanow, Senior District Judge. (8:12-cr-00300-DKC-1; 8:16-cv-01927-DKC)

Paresh S. Patel, OFFICE OF THE FEDERAL PUBLIC DEFENDER, Greenbelt, Maryland, for Appellant.

Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, NIEMEYER, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM.

Davon Stephon Williams seeks to appeal the district court's order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(B). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent "a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right." 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists could find the district court's assessment of the constitutional claims debatable or wrong. See Buck v. Davis, 137 S.Ct. 759, 773-74 (2017). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable and that the motion states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Gonzalez v. Thaler, 565 U.S. 134, 140-41 (2012) (citing Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000)).

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Williams has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.


Summaries of

United States v. Williams

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Jun 22, 2022
No. 19-7858 (4th Cir. Jun. 22, 2022)
Case details for

United States v. Williams

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. DAVON STEPHON WILLIAMS…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit

Date published: Jun 22, 2022

Citations

No. 19-7858 (4th Cir. Jun. 22, 2022)