From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Williams

United States District Court, D. New Jersey
Jan 20, 2022
Crim. 22-mj-06008-DEA (D.N.J. Jan. 20, 2022)

Opinion

Crim. 22-mj-06008-DEA

01-20-2022

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. PRINCE WILLIAMS


ORDER REGARDING USE OF VIDEO CONFERENCING/TELECONFERENCING

Douglas E. Arpert United States Magistrate Judge

In accordance with the operative COVID-19 Standing Orders, this Court finds:

[√] That the Defendant (or the Juvenile) has consented to the use of video teleconferencing/teleconferencing to conduct the proceeding(s) held today, after consultation with counsel; and

The proceeding(s) held on this date may be conducted by:

[√] Video Teleconferencing

[ ] Teleconferencing, because video teleconferencing is not reasonably available for the following reason:

[ ] The Defendant (or the Juvenile) is detained at a facility lacking video teleconferencing capability.

[ ] Other:


Summaries of

United States v. Williams

United States District Court, D. New Jersey
Jan 20, 2022
Crim. 22-mj-06008-DEA (D.N.J. Jan. 20, 2022)
Case details for

United States v. Williams

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. PRINCE WILLIAMS

Court:United States District Court, D. New Jersey

Date published: Jan 20, 2022

Citations

Crim. 22-mj-06008-DEA (D.N.J. Jan. 20, 2022)