From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Williams

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jan 26, 2012
No. CR-S-09-196 GEB (E.D. Cal. Jan. 26, 2012)

Opinion

No. CR-S-09-196 GEB

01-26-2012

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL LEON WILLIAMS, et. al. Defendant.

MICHAEL BECKWITH Assistant U.S. Attorney for the Government PETER KMETO Attorney for Defendant MICHAEL LEON WILLIAMS


PETER KMETO

Attorney at Law

Attorney for: MICHAEL LEON WILLIAMS

STIPULATION AND ORDER CONTINUING STATUS HEARING

Defendant: MICHAEL LEON WILLIAMS, through his attorney, PETER KMETO, and the United States of America, through its counsel of record, MICHAEL BECKWITH, stipulate and agree to the following:

1. The presently scheduled date of January 27, 2012 for Status Hearing shall be vacated as to defendant, MICHAEL LEON WILLIAMS, only, and said Hearing be rescheduled for March 16, 2012 at 9:00 a.m..
2. Defense investigation is nearing completion and, thereafter, further settlement negotiations will be conducted. Accordingly, the parties stipulate that time be excluded from January 20, 2012 to March 16, 2012 pursuant to 18 U.S. C. §3161(h)(7)(A) and 18 U.S.C. §3161(h)(8)(B)(iv) [Local Code T4] -additional time to adequately prepare for pretrial proceedings. The parties further stipulate that the interests of justice outweigh the defendant's and the public's interest in a speedy trial.

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

MICHAEL BECKWITH

Assistant U.S. Attorney

for the Government

PETER KMETO

Attorney for Defendant

MICHAEL LEON WILLIAMS

ORDER

UPON GOOD CAUSE SHOWN and the stipulation of the two parties, it is ordered that the hearing for STATUS HEARING as to Defendant, WILLIAMS, only, be continued as set forth above.

The Court finds excludable time pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(A), 18 U.S.C. §3161(h)(8)(B)(iv) and Local Rule T-4 from January 20, 2012 until March 16, 2012 for continuity of defense counsel and time to permit defense counsel to prepare and properly advise his client. The Court further finds that the interests of justice outweigh the defendant's and the public's interest in a speedy trial.

_________

GARLAND E. BURRELL, JR.

United States District Judge


Summaries of

United States v. Williams

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jan 26, 2012
No. CR-S-09-196 GEB (E.D. Cal. Jan. 26, 2012)
Case details for

United States v. Williams

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL LEON WILLIAMS, et. al…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Jan 26, 2012

Citations

No. CR-S-09-196 GEB (E.D. Cal. Jan. 26, 2012)