From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Williams

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT for the District of Colorado
Sep 6, 2012
Case No: 93-cr-00212-REB-01 (D. Colo. Sep. 6, 2012)

Opinion

Case No: 93-cr-00212-REB-01 USM No: 24720-013

09-06-2012

United States of America v. ADRIAN ARNETT WILLIAMS

Raymond P. Moore, FPD Defendant's Attorney


Date of Previous Judgment: January 14, 1994

(Use Date of Last Amended Judgment if Applicable)

Raymond P. Moore, FPD

Defendant's Attorney

Order Regarding Motion for Sentence Reduction Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2)

Upon motion of X the defendant [ ] the Director of the Bureau of Prisons [ ] the court under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) for a reduction in the term of imprisonment imposed based on a guideline sentencing range that has subsequently been lowered and made retroactive by the United States Sentencing Commission pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 994(u), and having considered such motion, and taking into account the sentencing factors set forth in 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a), to the extent that they are applicable, IT IS ORDERED that the motion is:

[ ] DENIED. X GRANTED and the defendant's previously imposed sentence of imprisonment (as reflected in the last judgment issued) of life as to Counts One and Two, to run concurrent, and 4 years as to Count Three, to run concurrent with Counts One and Two is reduced to 360 months as to each of Counts One and Two, and 48 months as to Count Three, all counts to run concurrent. I. COURT DETERMINATION OF GUIDELINE RANGE (Prior to Any Departures)

Previous Offense Level: 43 Amended Offense Level: 42

Criminal History Category: III Criminal History Category: III

Previous Guideline Range: life Amended Guideline Range: 360 months to life

II. SENTENCE RELATIVE TO AMENDED GUIDELINE RANGE

X The reduced sentence is within the amended guideline range. [ ] The previous term of imprisonment imposed was less than the guideline range applicable to the defendant at the time of sentencing as a result of a departure or Rule 35 reduction, and the reduced sentence is comparably less than the amended guideline range. [ ] Other (explain):

III. ADDITIONAL COMMENTS

Except as provided above, all provisions of the judgment dated January 14, 1994, shall remain in effect.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Robert E. Blackburn

Judge's signature

Effective ____________

(if different from order date)

Robert E. Blackburn, United States District Judge

Printed name and title


Summaries of

United States v. Williams

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT for the District of Colorado
Sep 6, 2012
Case No: 93-cr-00212-REB-01 (D. Colo. Sep. 6, 2012)
Case details for

United States v. Williams

Case Details

Full title:United States of America v. ADRIAN ARNETT WILLIAMS

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT for the District of Colorado

Date published: Sep 6, 2012

Citations

Case No: 93-cr-00212-REB-01 (D. Colo. Sep. 6, 2012)