From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Williams

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS
Feb 6, 2012
Case No. 99-10092-MLB (D. Kan. Feb. 6, 2012)

Opinion

Case No. 99-10092-MLB

02-06-2012

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. CRAIG T. WILLIAMS, Defendant.


Memorandum and Order

Defendant Craig Williams filed a motion pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) for a reduction in his term of imprisonment based on the retroactive Sentence Guidelines following the adoption of Amendment 750. (Doc. 108). The Court denied his motion. (Doc. 109). Williams has filed a Motion for Certificate of Appealability. (Doc. 110). The Tenth Circuit ruled that no certificate of appealability is required for an appeal taken from a motion under 18 U.S.C. § 3582. United States v. Randall, 2011 WL 6008983 at *4 n. 4 (10th Cir. Dec. 2, 2011). Williams' motion is denied as moot.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated this 6th day of February, 2012, at Wichita Kansas.

_________________

Monti L. Belot

United States District Judge


Summaries of

United States v. Williams

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS
Feb 6, 2012
Case No. 99-10092-MLB (D. Kan. Feb. 6, 2012)
Case details for

United States v. Williams

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. CRAIG T. WILLIAMS, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS

Date published: Feb 6, 2012

Citations

Case No. 99-10092-MLB (D. Kan. Feb. 6, 2012)