From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. William

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jan 5, 2012
Case No. 2:11-cr-00360 WBS (E.D. Cal. Jan. 5, 2012)

Opinion

Case No. 2:11-cr-00360 WBS

01-05-2012

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. PAUL WILLIAM MERCHANT, et al. Defendants.

ERIN J. RADEKIN Attorney at Law - SBN 214964 Attorney for Defendant PAUL WILLIAM MERCHANT


ERIN J. RADEKIN

Attorney at Law - SBN 214964

Attorney for Defendant

PAUL WILLIAM MERCHANT

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE STATUS CONFERENCE


STIPULATION

Plaintiff, United States of America, by and through its counsel, Assistant United States Attorney Michelle Rodriguez, defendant, Paul William Merchant, by and through his counsel, Erin J. Radekin, agree and stipulate to vacate the date set for status conference, January 9, 2012 at 9:30 a.m., and to continue the status conference until February 6, 2012 at 9:30 a.m., in the courtroom of the Honorable William B. Shubb.

The reason for this request is that Ms. Radekin broke her foot on November 29, 2011 and had surgery on her foot on December 9, 2011. She is not permitted to put weight on her left foot until mid-January. Hence, she will not be able to appear in court on January 9, 2012; however, the government has provided a plea agreement and Mr. Merchant and Ms. Radekin have met and discussed the agreement. Ms. Radekin needs to resolve some minor sentencing issues and discuss these issues with Mr. Merchant prior to entry of plea. Thus, additional time is needed for that purpose as well. At this time it appears likely that Mr. Merchant will enter a plea on the next court date. The parties will advise the Court if Mr. Merchant intends to enter a plea on February 6th in advance of that court date.

The parties further agree and stipulate that the time period from the filing of this stipulation until February 6, 2012 should be excluded in computing time for commencement of trial under the Speedy Trial Act, based upon the interest of justice under 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(B)(iv) and Local Code T4, to allow continuity of counsel and to allow reasonable time necessary for effective defense preparation. It is further agreed and stipulated that the ends of justice served in granting the request outweigh the best interests of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial.

Accordingly, the parties respectfully request the Court adopt this proposed stipulation. IT IS SO STIPULATED

BENJAMIN WAGNER

United States Attorney

By: ____________

MICHELLE RODRIGUEZ

Assistant United States Attorney

____________

ERIN J. RADEKIN

Attorney for Defendant

PAUL WILLIAM MERCHANT

ORDER

For the reasons set forth in the accompanying stipulation and declaration of counsel, the status conference of January 9, 2012 at 9:30 a.m. is VACATED and the above-captioned matter is set for status conference on February 6, 2012 at 9:30 a.m. The court finds excludable time in this matter through February 6, 2012 under 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(B)(iv) and Local Code T4, to allow continuity of counsel and to allow reasonable time necessary for effective defense preparation. For the reasons stipulated by the parties, the Court finds that the interest of justice served by granting the request outweigh the best interests of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial. 18 U.S.C. 3161(h)(7)(A), (h)(7)(B)(iv).

IT IS SO ORDERED.

_____________________

WILLIAM B. SHUBB

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

United States v. William

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jan 5, 2012
Case No. 2:11-cr-00360 WBS (E.D. Cal. Jan. 5, 2012)
Case details for

United States v. William

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. PAUL WILLIAM MERCHANT, et al…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Jan 5, 2012

Citations

Case No. 2:11-cr-00360 WBS (E.D. Cal. Jan. 5, 2012)