From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Wilbert

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN NORTHERN DIVISION
Jul 7, 2020
Case Number: 17-20750 (E.D. Mich. Jul. 7, 2020)

Opinion

Case Number: 17-20750

07-07-2020

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. DAMON LAVELLE WILBERT, Defendant.



Magistrate Judge Patricia T. Morris ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL

On November 8, 2017, Defendant Wilbert was indicted by a grand jury of one count of possession with intent to distribute cocaine. ECF No. 11. He pled guilty and on March 30, 2018 he was sentenced to 120 months incarceration and eight years of supervised release. ECF No. 26.

Defendant filed a pro se motion seeking appointment of counsel to represent him in obtaining compassionate release due to the spread of COVID-19. ECF No. 27. Due to mailing delays caused by COVID-19, the motion was docketed on June 23, 2020, but in accordance with 20-AO-26, the postmark date of June 5, 2020 was used for the filing date.

The Sixth Amendment secures to a defendant who faces incarceration the right to counsel at all "critical stages" of the criminal process. United States v. Wade, 388 U.S. 218, 224 (1967). The Supreme Court has held that prisoners' post-conviction right to counsel extends only to the first appeal of right and no further. Pennsylvania v. Finley, 481 U.S. 551, 555 (1987). The decision to appoint counsel is within the discretion of the court, and the appointment of counsel is only required where the interests of justice or due process so require. Mira v. Marshall, 806 F.2d 636, 638 (6th Cir. 1986). Appointment of counsel is therefore required only if, given the difficulty of the case and petitioner's ability, the petitioner could not obtain justice without an attorney, he could not obtain a lawyer on his own, and he would have a reasonable chance of winning with the assistance of counsel. See Thirkield v. Pitcher, 199 F. Supp. 2d 637, 653 (E.D. Mich. 2002).

Defendant has not satisfied the high burden of demonstrating that appointment of counsel is warranted. Seeking compassionate relief does not involve complex facts or legal doctrines that would prevent Defendant from effectively bringing his claim on his own behalf.

Accordingly, it is ORDERED that Wilbert's motion for appointment of counsel, ECF No. 27, is DENIED.

Dated: July 7, 2020

s/Thomas L. Ludington

THOMAS L. LUDINGTON

United States District Judge

PROOF OF SERVICE

The undersigned certifies that a copy of the foregoing order was served upon each attorney of record herein by electronic means and to Damon Wilbert #16814-039, Federal Correctional Institution, PO Box 1000, Milan, MI 48160 by first class U.S. mail on July 7, 2020.

s/Kelly Winslow

KELLY WINSLOW, Case Manager


Summaries of

United States v. Wilbert

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN NORTHERN DIVISION
Jul 7, 2020
Case Number: 17-20750 (E.D. Mich. Jul. 7, 2020)
Case details for

United States v. Wilbert

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. DAMON LAVELLE WILBERT, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN NORTHERN DIVISION

Date published: Jul 7, 2020

Citations

Case Number: 17-20750 (E.D. Mich. Jul. 7, 2020)