From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Whittaker

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA AT BLUEFIELD
Jan 13, 2015
CRIMINAL NO. 1:13-00074 (S.D.W. Va. Jan. 13, 2015)

Opinion

CRIMINAL NO. 1:13-00074

01-13-2015

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. MIRANDA WHITTAKER


MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

Pending before the court is defendant's motion, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2), for a reduction in her sentence based on a subsequent reduction in the applicable sentencing guideline. (Doc. No. 37). On April 30, 2014, the United States Sentencing Commission submitted to Congress an amendment to the federal sentencing guidelines that reduces the guidelines applicable to drug trafficking offenses. Specifically, Amendment 782 reduces by two the offense levels assigned in the Drug Quantity Table, resulting in lower guideline ranges for most drug trafficking offenses. Amendment 782, sometimes called "drugs minus two" or the "2014 drug guidelines amendment," took effect on November 1, 2014. On July 18, 2014, the Sentencing Commission voted to give retroactive effect to Amendment 782. Amendment 782 is however subject to the following limitation: "The court shall not order a reduced term of imprisonment based on Amendment 782 unless the effective date of the court's order is November 1, 2015, or later." U.S.S.G. § 1B1.10(e)(1). The court has received materials from the United States Probation Office regarding defendant's eligibility for a sentence reduction.

Based on the foregoing, the court DIRECTS the Federal Public Defender to undertake representation of the defendant or, if the Office is unable to represent defendant, refer the matter to the CJA Supervising Attorney so that counsel may be appointed. The court further DIRECTS that, within ten days of the entry of this Order, the United States and defendant file written memoranda addressing all relevant issues, including eligibility, whether defendant should receive a reduction, and, if so, the extent of any reduction. The Probation Office is DIRECTED to make its Addendum to the Presentence Report available to counsel if it has not already done so.

The Clerk is DIRECTED to send a copy of this Memorandum Opinion and Order to defendant, the United States Attorney, the Federal Public Defender, and the United States Probation Office.

IT IS SO ORDERED this 13th day of January, 2015.

ENTER:

/s/_________

David A. Faber

Senior United States District Judge


Summaries of

United States v. Whittaker

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA AT BLUEFIELD
Jan 13, 2015
CRIMINAL NO. 1:13-00074 (S.D.W. Va. Jan. 13, 2015)
Case details for

United States v. Whittaker

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. MIRANDA WHITTAKER

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA AT BLUEFIELD

Date published: Jan 13, 2015

Citations

CRIMINAL NO. 1:13-00074 (S.D.W. Va. Jan. 13, 2015)