Summary
holding that "mere presence" in a vehicle carrying marijuana is insufficient to sustain a conviction for "facilitating the transportation of marihuana"
Summary of this case from U.S. v. PerlazaOpinion
No. 72-2545.
November 13, 1972.
Barry Tarlow (argued), Los Angeles, Cal., for defendant-appellant.
James W. Meyers, Asst. U.S. Atty. (argued), Stephen G. Nelson, Asst. U.S. Atty., Harry D. Steward, U.S. Atty., San Diego, Cal., for plaintiff-appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of California.
Before KOELSCH, KILKENNY and CHOY, Circuit Judges.
Appellant urges several assignments of error on this appeal from the judgment convicting him of the crime of facilitating the transportation of marihuana (21 U.S.C. § 176a). Since one of them is well taken and requires reversal, we do not reach the others.
The record discloses nothing more than appellant's "mere presence" in the vehicle carrying the contraband. The rule is "firmly established" that such evidence cannot support the verdict. United States v. Thomas, 453 F.2d 141 (9th Cir. 1971), cert. denied, Lucas v. United States, 405 U.S. 1069, 92 S.Ct. 1516, 31 L.Ed.2d 801 (1972).
Reversed, with direction to dismiss the indictment.