From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Whitaker

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Apr 26, 2016
647 F. App'x 195 (4th Cir. 2016)

Opinion

No. 15-7989

04-26-2016

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. RODERICK ARNEZ WHITAKER, a/k/a Snoop, Defendant - Appellant.

Roderick Arnez Whitaker, Appellant Pro Se. Banumathi Rangarajan, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.


UNPUBLISHED Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. W. Earl Britt, Senior District Judge. (5:09-cr-00125-BR-1) Before WILKINSON, KING, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Roderick Arnez Whitaker, Appellant Pro Se. Banumathi Rangarajan, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Roderick Arnez Whitaker appeals the district court's order granting his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2012) motion for sentence reduction based on Amendment 782 to the Sentencing Guidelines. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny Whitaker's motion for appointment of counsel and affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See United States v. Whitaker, No. 5:09-cr-00125-BR-1 (E.D.N.C. Sept. 11, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid in the decisional process.

AFFIRMED


Summaries of

United States v. Whitaker

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Apr 26, 2016
647 F. App'x 195 (4th Cir. 2016)
Case details for

United States v. Whitaker

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. RODERICK ARNEZ…

Court:UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

Date published: Apr 26, 2016

Citations

647 F. App'x 195 (4th Cir. 2016)