From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Whalen

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Jun 10, 2005
134 F. App'x 154 (9th Cir. 2005)

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION. (See Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure Rule 36-3)

Douglas W. Fong, Esq., Office of the U.S. Attorney, Medford, OR, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Tonia L. Moro, Esq., Federal Public Defender's Office, Medford, OR, for Defendant-Appellant.


District of Oregon, Medford. D.C. No. CR-02-30010-ALA.

Before: REINHARDT, SILVERMAN, and CLIFTON, Circuit Judges.

ORDER

Pursuant to the Supreme Court's order vacating the judgment and remanding this case for further consideration, we remand to the district court for reconsideration in light of United States v. Booker, --- U.S. ----, 125 S.Ct. 738, 160 L.Ed.2d 621 (2005) and United States v. Ameline, 409 F.3d 1073 (9th Cir.2005).


Summaries of

United States v. Whalen

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Jun 10, 2005
134 F. App'x 154 (9th Cir. 2005)
Case details for

United States v. Whalen

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff--Appellee, v. Bruce E. WHALEN…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit

Date published: Jun 10, 2005

Citations

134 F. App'x 154 (9th Cir. 2005)