From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. West

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE EASTERN DIVISION
Jan 14, 2021
No. 1:18-cr-10079-JDB-1 (W.D. Tenn. Jan. 14, 2021)

Opinion

No. 1:18-cr-10079-JDB-1

01-14-2021

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. CHRISTOPHER ANDREW WEST, Defendant.


ORDER CONSTRUING MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME AS 28 U.S.C. § 2255 MOTION AND DIRECTING CLERK TO TERMINATE MOTION AND FILE DOCUMENT IN NEW CASE

On January 12, 2021, the Defendant, Christopher Andrew West, filed a pro se motion for an extension of time to file a motion to vacate, set aside, or correct his sentence pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255. (Docket Entry ("D.E.) 58.) For the following reasons, the Court CONSTRUES the motion as a § 2255 petition and DIRECTS the Clerk to open a new case.

Defendant asserts in his motion that he has not had an opportunity to prepare a § 2255 petition due to "lockdowns" at his prison resulting from the COVID-19 pandemic. (Id. at PageID 162.) He also represents that he

plan[s] to file a Motion under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 to address the extraordinarily long sentence. The sentencing judge specifically stated his desire to sentence Mr. West under 180 months and if Mr. West could bring to the court's attention other cases where this was accomplished, it would be considered. That is the subject of the motion.
(Id. at PageID 161-62.)

In United States v. Asakevich, 810 F.3d 418 (6th Cir. 2016), the Sixth Circuit held that district courts do not have jurisdiction to grant a prisoner an extension of time to file a § 2255 petition before such a petition is actually filed. Asakevich, 810 F.3d at 423-24. The court suggested, however, that if the extension motion contains "sufficient details about the proposed § 2255 action," the district court may "fairly construe the extension motion as a § 2255 action." Id. (citing Castro v. United States, 540 U.S. 375, 381-83 (2003)).

West's motion for an extension of time contains details about the subject matter of his planned § 2255 petition. Therefore, the Court CONSTRUES the motion as a § 2255 petition. The Clerk is DIRECTED to TERMINATE the motion at D.E. 58 and FILE the document as the case-initiating pleading in a new case.

IT IS SO ORDERED this 14th day of January 2021.

s/ J. DANIEL BREEN

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

United States v. West

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE EASTERN DIVISION
Jan 14, 2021
No. 1:18-cr-10079-JDB-1 (W.D. Tenn. Jan. 14, 2021)
Case details for

United States v. West

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. CHRISTOPHER ANDREW WEST, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE EASTERN DIVISION

Date published: Jan 14, 2021

Citations

No. 1:18-cr-10079-JDB-1 (W.D. Tenn. Jan. 14, 2021)

Citing Cases

West v. United States

. (United States v. West, No. 1:18-cr-10079-JDB-1 (W.D. Tenn.) (“No. 1:18-cr-10079”), D.E.…