From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Wessel

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION
Dec 11, 2014
Case No. 1:14-cr-00072-PLM-10 (W.D. Mich. Dec. 11, 2014)

Opinion

Case No. 1:14-cr-00072-PLM-10

12-11-2014

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. CYNTHIA WESSEL, Defendant.


Honorable Paul L. Maloney REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

Pursuant to W.D. MICH. L.CR.R. 11.1, I conducted a plea hearing in the captioned case on December 3, 2014, after receiving the written consent of defendant and all counsel, which was adjourned prior to completion to address a legal issue. The hearing resumed and was completed today. At the hearing, defendant Cynthia Wessel entered a plea of guilty to the Superseding Information in exchange for the undertakings made by the government in the written plea agreement. In the Superseding Information, defendant is charged with Misprision of a Felony, in violation of Title 18 United States Code, section 4. On the basis of the record made at the hearing, I find that defendant is fully capable and competent to enter an informed plea; that the plea is made knowingly and with full understanding of each of the rights waived by defendant; that it is made voluntarily and free from any force, threats, or promises, apart from the promises in the plea agreement; that the defendant understands the nature of the charge and penalties provided by law; and that the plea has a sufficient basis in fact.

Accordingly, I recommend that defendant's plea of guilty to the Superseding Information be accepted, that the court adjudicate defendant guilty, and that the written plea agreement be considered for acceptance at the time of sentencing. Acceptance of the plea, adjudication of guilt, acceptance of the plea agreement, and imposition of sentence are specifically reserved for the district judge. Date: December 11, 2014

/s/ Phillip J. Green

PHILLIP J. GREEN

United States Magistrate Judge

NOTICE TO PARTIES

You have the right to de novo review of the foregoing findings by the district judge. Any application for review must be in writing, must specify the portions of the findings or proceedings objected to, and must be filed and served no later than14 days after the plea hearing. See W.D. MICH. L.CR.R. 11.1(d).


Summaries of

United States v. Wessel

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION
Dec 11, 2014
Case No. 1:14-cr-00072-PLM-10 (W.D. Mich. Dec. 11, 2014)
Case details for

United States v. Wessel

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. CYNTHIA WESSEL, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

Date published: Dec 11, 2014

Citations

Case No. 1:14-cr-00072-PLM-10 (W.D. Mich. Dec. 11, 2014)