Opinion
22-30063
10-18-2022
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. SHAWN MICHAEL WENTZ, Defendant-Appellant.
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
Submitted October 12, 2022.[**]
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Montana, D.C. No. 1:17-cr-00024-SPW-1, Susan P. Watters, District Judge, Presiding.
Before: SILVERMAN, GRABER, and BENNETT, Circuit Judges.
MEMORANDUM [*]
Shawn Michael Wentz appeals from the 6-month custodial sentence and 114-month term of supervised release imposed following the district court's revocation of supervised release. Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), Wentz's counsel has filed a brief stating that there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. We have provided Wentz the opportunity to file a pro se supplemental brief. No pro se supplemental brief or answering brief has been filed.
Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 80 (1988), discloses no arguable grounds for relief on direct appeal.
Counsel's motion to withdraw is GRANTED.
Within 7 days of this disposition, appellee must serve the disposition on appellant individually and provide the court with proof of service, including appellant's mailing address.
AFFIRMED.
[*] This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
[**] The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).