From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Welp

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Oct 26, 1972
469 F.2d 688 (9th Cir. 1972)

Summary

holding that " definite and firm conviction that a mistake was committed below is a prerequisite to appellate reversal" of a district court's finding of fact

Summary of this case from U.S. v. Phillips

Opinion

No. 72-2308.

October 26, 1972.

Peter L. Powers, Weatherford, Thompson, Horton Jordan P. C., Albany, Or., for defendant-appellee Citizens Valley Bank.

Sidney I. Lezak, U.S. Atty., Portland, Or., for defendant-appellee United States of America.

Jack Damian Welp, pro per.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Oregon.

Before HAMLIN and DUNIWAY, Circuit Judges, and JAMESON, District Judge.

Honorable William J. Jameson, Senior United States District Judge, District of Montana, sitting by designation.


A search incident to an arrest for robbery of the Citizens Valley Bank, Shedd, Oregon, revealed $369.00 cash on Welp's immediate person. Welp was subsequently tried and convicted of that bank robbery, and we affirmed. United States v. Welp, 446 F.2d 867 (9th Cir. 1971).

The money in question was turned over to the said bank. Appellant filed a petition with the District Court seeking the return of the money to him. After a hearing, the District Court dismissed appellant's petition, having found that the $369.00 was a product of the bank robbery, and belonged to the bank. Welp appeals from this determination.

Questions of fact determined by the trial judge must be upheld on review unless "clearly erroneous." Campbell v. United States, 373 U.S. 487, 493, 83 S.Ct. 1356, 10 L.Ed.2d 501 (1963); United States v. Page, 302 F.2d 81, 85 (9th Cir. 1962). A "definite and firm conviction" that a mistake was committed below is a prerequisite to appellate reversal. United States v. United States Gypsum Co., 333 U.S. 364, 395, 68 S.Ct. 525, 92 L.Ed. 746 (1940).

Applying these standards we hold that under the facts of this case the judgment must be affirmed.

It is so ordered.


Summaries of

United States v. Welp

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Oct 26, 1972
469 F.2d 688 (9th Cir. 1972)

holding that " definite and firm conviction that a mistake was committed below is a prerequisite to appellate reversal" of a district court's finding of fact

Summary of this case from U.S. v. Phillips
Case details for

United States v. Welp

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE, v. JACK DAMIAN WELP…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit

Date published: Oct 26, 1972

Citations

469 F.2d 688 (9th Cir. 1972)

Citing Cases

U.S. v. Phillips

The district court also did not clearly err by finding that certain buses had no value as of September 18,…

United States v. Schmidt

Findings of fact made by the trial court in pretrial proceedings are conclusive unless clearly erroneous.…