Opinion
Case No. 04-73348
11-20-2013
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Plaintiff, v. QUADRO B. WELLS, Defendant.
Hon. Marianne O. Battani
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION AND DENYING
AS MOOT OBJECTION TO WRIT OF CONTINUING GARNISHMENT
Plaintiff applied for a writ of continuing garnishment to obtain funds belonging to Defendant Quadro Wells. Defendant requested a hearing regarding the garnishment of his wages, which was construed as an objection to garnishment.
The Court referred this matter to Magistrate Judge David R. Grand, who issued a Report and Recommendation ("R&R") on October 22, 2013. Magistrate Grand recommended that the Court deny the objection as moot based upon the parties' notice to the Court that the parties had reached a resolution and placed the terms of the agreement on the record.
In his R&R, Magistrate Judge Grand informed the parties that objections to the R&R must be filed within "14 days of service" and that a "[f]ailure to file specific objections constitutes a waiver of any further right of appeal." (R&R at 2-3). Neither party filed an objection, and any right to de novo review and appeal has been waived.
Accordingly, the Court ADOPTS the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation and DENIES Defendant's objection as moot.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
________________________
MARIANNE O. BATTANI
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
Copies of this Order were mailed and/or e-filed to Defendant and counsel of record on this date.
Bernadette M. Thebolt
Case Manager