From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Wei Jun Chen

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Jan 19, 2006
163 F. App'x 602 (9th Cir. 2006)

Opinion

Submitted Jan. 9, 2006.

This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION. (See Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure Rule 36-3)

Patrick J. Smith, USNMI--Office of the U.S. Attorney, Saipan, MP, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Bruce Berline, Esq., Garapan, Danilo T. Aguilar, Esq., Saipan, MP, for Defendants-Appellants.


Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of the Northern Mariana Islands, Alex R. Munson, Chief District Judge, Presiding. D.C. No. CR-03-00016-ARM-02, D.C. No. CR-03-00016-ARM-003.

Before: HUG, O'SCANNLAIN, and SILVERMAN, Circuit Judges.

Page 603.

MEMORANDUM

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

Wei Jun Chen and Jia Huan Chen appeal their 78-month sentences imposed following convictions for conspiracy to collect extensions of credit by extortionate means, and collection of extensions of credit by extortionate means, in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 2 and 894. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291.

We remand to the sentencing court to proceed pursuant to United States v. Ameline, 409 F.3d 1073, 1084-85 (9th Cir.2005) (en banc).

REMANDED.


Summaries of

United States v. Wei Jun Chen

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Jan 19, 2006
163 F. App'x 602 (9th Cir. 2006)
Case details for

United States v. Wei Jun Chen

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff--Appellee, v. WEI JUN CHEN…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit

Date published: Jan 19, 2006

Citations

163 F. App'x 602 (9th Cir. 2006)