From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Webb

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Jun 15, 2021
2:15-CR-134 TLN (E.D. Cal. Jun. 15, 2021)

Opinion

2:15-CR-134 TLN

06-15-2021

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. LONDON WEBB, et al. Defendants.

CLEMENTE M. JIMÉNEZ, ESQ. California State Bar No. 207136 Attorney for LONDON WEBB


CLEMENTE M. JIMÉNEZ, ESQ. California State Bar No. 207136 Attorney for LONDON WEBB

STIPULATION AND ORDER VACATING DATE, CONTINUING CASE, AND EXCLUDING TIME

Troy L. Nunley United States District Judge

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between Assistant United States Attorney Justin Lee, Counsel for Plaintiff, and Clemente M. Jiménez, Counsel for London Webb, that the status conference scheduled for June 17, 2021, be vacated and the matter continued to this Court's criminal calendar on August 26, 2021, at 9:30 a.m., for further status conference. This proposed stipulation relates to defendant Webb only.

Defense counsel will require additional time to review discovery and conduct further investigation, as necessary.

The parties further agree that the failure to grant the requested continuance would deny defense counsel reasonable time necessary for effective preparation, taking into account the exercise of due diligence.

IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED that time within which the trial of this case must be commenced under the Speedy Trial Act, 18 U.S.C. Section 3161 et seq. be excluded from the date of the parties' stipulation, June 15, 2021, to and including August 26, 2021, from computation of time pursuant to Section 3161(h)(7)(A) and (B)(iv), (Local code T-4), and that the ends of justice served in granting the continuance and allowing the defendant further time to prepare outweigh the best interests of the public and the defendant to a speedy trial.

ORDER

IT IS SO ORDERED, that the status conference in the above-entitled matter scheduled for June 17, 2021, be vacated and the matter continued to August 26, 2021, at 9:30 a.m., for further status conference. The Court finds that 1) the failure to grant the requested continuance would deny defense counsel reasonable time necessary for effective preparation, taking into account the exercise of due diligence, and 2) the ends of justice served by granting the requested continuance outweigh the best interests of the public and defendant in a speedy trial.

It is hereby ordered that time under the Speedy Trial Act be excluded from the date of the parties' stipulation, June 15, 2021, to and including August 26, 2021, from computation of time pursuant to Section 18 U.S.C. 3161(h)(7)(A) and (B)(iv) for defense preparation.


Summaries of

United States v. Webb

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Jun 15, 2021
2:15-CR-134 TLN (E.D. Cal. Jun. 15, 2021)
Case details for

United States v. Webb

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. LONDON WEBB, et al. Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Jun 15, 2021

Citations

2:15-CR-134 TLN (E.D. Cal. Jun. 15, 2021)