Opinion
23-CV-422-JFH
04-15-2024
OPINION AND ORDER
JOHNF. HEIL, III UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Before the Court is a motion to dismiss the Supplemental Complaint [Dkt. No. 27] with prejudice (“Motion”), filed by Plaintiff United States of America (the “United States”). Dkt. No. 37.
Under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(2), a motion to dismiss filed by the plaintiff after the opposing party has answered, may be granted “by court order, on terms that the court considers proper.” Fed.R.Civ.P. 41(a)(2). Based on the facts set out in the Motion, the Court concludes that dismissal of the Supplemental Complaint [Dkt. No. 27] with prejudice is appropriate. Accordingly, the United States' Motion should be granted.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the United States' Motion [Dkt. No. 37] is GRANTED and the Supplemental Complaint [Dkt. No. 27] is dismissed with prejudice.