Opinion
No. 20-2645
03-23-2021
United States of America Plaintiff - Appellee v. Kristi Weaver Defendant - Appellant
Appeal from United States District Court for the Western District of Missouri - Springfield [Unpublished] Before KELLY, ERICKSON, and STRAS, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM.
Kristi Weaver pleaded guilty to conspiring to distribute methamphetamine, 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1), (b)(1)(A), 846, and possessing a firearm in furtherance of a drug-trafficking crime, 18 U.S.C. § 924(c)(1)(A). As part of her plea agreement, she waived her right to appeal unless, as relevant here, her sentence exceeded the statutory maximum. The district court imposed a total sentence of 181 months in prison, which included 121 months on the drug count and 60 months on the firearm count. Neither sentence exceeded the statutory maximum. See 18 U.S.C. § 924(c)(1)(A); 21 U.S.C. § 841(b)(1)(A). In an Anders brief, Weaver's counsel discusses the appeal waiver and the sentence, as well as requests permission to withdraw. See Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967).
The Honorable Stephen R. Bough, United States District Judge for the Western District of Missouri.
Upon careful review, we conclude that the waiver is both enforceable and applicable. See United States v. Scott, 627 F.3d 702, 704 (8th Cir. 2010) (reviewing this issue de novo); United States v. Andis, 333 F.3d 886, 889-92 (8th Cir. 2003) (en banc) (explaining that an appeal waiver will be enforced if the appeal falls within the scope of the waiver, the defendant knowingly and voluntarily entered into the plea agreement and the waiver, and enforcing the waiver would not result in a miscarriage of justice). We have also independently reviewed the record and conclude that no other non-frivolous issues exist. See Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 82-83 (1988). Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal and grant counsel permission to withdraw.
We continue to remind counsel that "Anders briefing must be done as an advocate" on behalf of the defendant, not the government. Evans v. Clarke, 868 F.2d 267, 268 (8th Cir. 1989) (internal quotation marks omitted); see Robinson v. Black, 812 F.2d 1084, 1086 (8th Cir. 1987).