From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Wax

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY
Oct 2, 2012
Mag. No. 11-2525 (DBA) (D.N.J. Oct. 2, 2012)

Opinion

Mag. No. 11-2525 (DBA)

10-02-2012

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. DAVID WAX and JUDY WAX

Nelson S.T. Thayer, Jr. Attorney In Charge. Treston Office R. Joseph Gribko Assistant United States Attorney Mitchell Ansell, Esq. Counsel for Defendant David Wax Steven Secare, Esq. Counsel for defendant Judy Wax


Hon. Douglas E. Arpert


ORDER FOR CONTINUANCE

This matter having come before .the Court on the joint application of Paul J. Fishman, United States Attorney for the District of New Jersey (R. Joseph Gribko, Assistant U.S. Attorney, appearing), and defendants David Wax and Judy Wax (Mitchell J. Ansell, Esq. and Steven Secare, Esq., appearing), for an order granting a continuance of the proceedings in the above-captioned matter, and the defendants and their counsel being aware that an Information or Indictment ordinarily must be filed within thirty (30) days of defendant's initial appearance on this charge, pursuant to Title 18, United States Code, Section 3161(b); and, pursuant to Title 18, United States Code, Section 3161(h)(7)(A), the United States and the defendants having requested this seventh continuance so that the parties can negotiate plea agreements and thereby avoid a possible trial; and for good cause shown;

IT is on this 28 day of September, 2012,

ORDERED that the time from the date this Order is entered, to and including January 10, 2013, shall be excluded in calculating the time within which an Information or Indictment must be filed under the Speedy Trial Act for the following reasons:

1. Both the United States and the defendants desire tine to discuss plea negotiations, which would render any grand jury proceedings and any subsequent trial of this natter unnecessary;

2, Pursuant to Title 18, United States Code, Section 3161(h)(7)(A), the ends of justice served by granting the continuance outweigh the best interest of the public and the defendants in a speedy trial.

______________________

HON, DOUGLAS E. ARPERT

United States Magistrate Judge
______________________
Nelson S.T. Thayer, Jr.
Attorney In Charge. Treston Office
______________________
R. Joseph Gribko
Assistant United States Attorney
______________________
Mitchell Ansell, Esq.
Counsel for Defendant David Wax
______________________
Steven Secare, Esq.
Counsel for defendant Judy Wax


Summaries of

United States v. Wax

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY
Oct 2, 2012
Mag. No. 11-2525 (DBA) (D.N.J. Oct. 2, 2012)
Case details for

United States v. Wax

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. DAVID WAX and JUDY WAX

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

Date published: Oct 2, 2012

Citations

Mag. No. 11-2525 (DBA) (D.N.J. Oct. 2, 2012)