From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Watts

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE AT CHATTANOOGA
Jun 14, 2013
Case No. 1:04-cr-149 (E.D. Tenn. Jun. 14, 2013)

Opinion

Case No. 1:04-cr-149

06-14-2013

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. PATRICK LAVAR WATTS


COLLIER/CARTER


MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

The defendant appeared for a hearing before the undersigned on June 14, 2013, in accordance with Rule 32.1 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure on the Petition for Warrant for Offender Under Supervision (Petition) of U.S. Probation Officer Kevin Matherly and the Warrant for Arrest issued by U.S. District Curtis L. Collier. Those present for the hearing included:

(1) AUSA Perry Piper for the USA.
(2) Defendant PATRICK LAVAR WATTS.
(3) Attorney Myrlene Marsa for defendant.
(4) Deputy Clerk Kelli Jones.

After being sworn in due form of law the defendant was informed or reminded of his privilege against self-incrimination accorded him under the 5th Amendment to the United States Constitution.

It was determined the defendant wished to be represented by an attorney and he qualified for the appointment of an attorney to represent him at government expense. Federal Defender Services of Eastern Tennessee, Inc. was APPOINTED to represent the defendant. It was determined the defendant had been provided with a copy of the Petition and the Warrant for Arrest and had the opportunity of reviewing those documents with his attorney. It was also determined the defendant was capable of being able to read and understand the copy of the aforesaid documents he had been provided.

Defendant waived his right to a preliminary hearing but requested a detention hearing.

AUSA Poole called USPO Kevin Matherly as a witness and moved that the defendant be detained pending the revocation hearing.

Findings


(1) Based upon USPO Matherly's testimony and defendant's waiver of
preliminary hearing, the undersigned finds there is probable cause to believe defendant has committed violations of his conditions of supervised release as alleged or set forth in the Petition.
(2) The defendant has not carried his burden under Rule 32.1(a)(6) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, that if released on bail he will not flee or will not pose a danger to the community.

Conclusions

It is ORDERED:

(1) The motion of AUSA Piper that the defendant be DETAINED WITHOUT BAIL pending the revocation hearing before U.S. District Judge Curtis L. Collier is GRANTED.
(2) The U.S. Marshal shall transport defendant to a revocation hearing Judge Collier on Thursday, June 20, 2013, at 2:00 pm.

ENTER.

William B. Mitchell Carter

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE


Summaries of

United States v. Watts

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE AT CHATTANOOGA
Jun 14, 2013
Case No. 1:04-cr-149 (E.D. Tenn. Jun. 14, 2013)
Case details for

United States v. Watts

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. PATRICK LAVAR WATTS

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE AT CHATTANOOGA

Date published: Jun 14, 2013

Citations

Case No. 1:04-cr-149 (E.D. Tenn. Jun. 14, 2013)