From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Waterman

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA OAKLAND DIVISION
May 14, 2013
Case No: CR 12-0707 SBA (N.D. Cal. May. 14, 2013)

Opinion

Case No: CR 12-0707 SBA

05-14-2013

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. SWEVEN WATERMAN, Defendant.


ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT

AND RECOMMENDATION

REGARDING GUILTY PLEA


Docket 12

On January 2, 2013, the Court referred this matter to Magistrate Judge Westmore ("the magistrate") for a report and recommendation on the acceptance of Defendant's guilty plea. Dkt. 9. On January 8, 2013, the Defendant appeared before the magistrate and, with the assistance of counsel, waived his right to enter a guilty plea before a district judge and instead consented to enter his plea in a hearing before the magistrate. See Dkt. 12. The magistrate conducted a full hearing in the manner set forth in Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 11. Id. After the advisements set forth in Rule 11, the Defendant entered a guilty plea in open court. Specifically, the Defendant pled guilty pursuant to a written plea agreement to the sole count in the Indictment charging Defendant with being a felon in possession of a firearm and ammunition in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1). Id. The magistrate found that Defendant was fully competent and capable of entering an informed plea, that he was aware of the nature of the charges and the consequences of the guilty plea, and that the guilty plea was knowing and voluntary and supported by an independent factual basis. Id.

On January 10, 2013, the magistrate issued a Report and Recommendation Regarding Guilty Plea in which she recommends that this Court accept Defendant's guilty plea. Dkt. 12. The Report and Recommendation advises the parties that they may serve and file specific written objections to the order within fourteen days after being served with a copy of the order. Id. No written objections to the Report and Recommendation were filed prior to the hearing. At the May 13, 2013 sentencing hearing in this matter, the parties indicated that they have no objections to the Report and Recommendation. Accordingly,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT the magistrate's Report and Recommendation (Dkt. 12) is ACCEPTED, the Defendant's guilty plea is accepted, and the magistrate's Report and Recommendation shall become the order of this Court.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

______________

SAUNDRA BROWN ARMSTRONG

United States District Judge


Summaries of

United States v. Waterman

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA OAKLAND DIVISION
May 14, 2013
Case No: CR 12-0707 SBA (N.D. Cal. May. 14, 2013)
Case details for

United States v. Waterman

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. SWEVEN WATERMAN, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA OAKLAND DIVISION

Date published: May 14, 2013

Citations

Case No: CR 12-0707 SBA (N.D. Cal. May. 14, 2013)