From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Washington

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Jun 14, 2022
2:13-cr-0206 TLN AC (E.D. Cal. Jun. 14, 2022)

Opinion

2:13-cr-0206 TLN AC

06-14-2022

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent, v. ISRAEL WASHINGTON, Movant.


ORDER

ALLISON CLAIRE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE.

Movant, a federal prisoner proceeding pro se on a motion to vacate, set aside, or correct his sentence pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255, has filed a motion to strike respondent's opposition to his § 2255 motion. ECF No. 263. He seeks to strike the opposition on the ground that it fails to address the issue in his § 2255 motion. Id.

Movant's motion to vacate challenges the denial of a request to have witness testimony read back to the jury. ECF No. 249. Respondent's opposition addresses this claim. ECF No. 262. The motion to strike will therefore be denied. Movant will be provided an extension of time to file a reply in support of his § 2255 motion. If movant does not file a further reply, the motion to strike will be construed as a reply.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. Movant's motion to strike (ECF No. 263) is DENIED.
2. Movant may file a reply to respondent's opposition within twenty-one days of the service of this order.


Summaries of

United States v. Washington

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Jun 14, 2022
2:13-cr-0206 TLN AC (E.D. Cal. Jun. 14, 2022)
Case details for

United States v. Washington

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent, v. ISRAEL WASHINGTON, Movant.

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Jun 14, 2022

Citations

2:13-cr-0206 TLN AC (E.D. Cal. Jun. 14, 2022)