From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Washburn

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Feb 20, 2013
CRIMINAL NO. 4:12-CR-00112 (M.D. Pa. Feb. 20, 2013)

Opinion

CRIMINAL NO. 4:12-CR-00112

02-20-2013

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. JESSE WASHBURN, NATHAN WASHBURN, and NICHOLE PERKINS, Defendants


(Judge Conner)


ORDER

AND NOW this 20th day of February, 2013, upon consideration of defendant Nathan Washburn's motion in limine (Doc. 105) seeking additional peremptory challenges for the defense as part of the jury selection process, filed January 21, 2013, and it appearing that the grant of such a motion in cases involving multiple defendants is within the sound discretion of the trial court, see FED. R. CRIM. PRO. 24(b); see also United States v. McClendon, 782 F.2d 785, 787 (9th Cir. 1986) (stating that right to additional challenges is permissive, not mandatory), it is hereby ORDERED that:

1. Defendants' motion is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part.
2. Each defendant in this matter shall have FOUR peremptory challenges to exercise individually.

______________________

CHRISTOPHER C. CONNER

United States District Judge


Summaries of

United States v. Washburn

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Feb 20, 2013
CRIMINAL NO. 4:12-CR-00112 (M.D. Pa. Feb. 20, 2013)
Case details for

United States v. Washburn

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. JESSE WASHBURN, NATHAN WASHBURN, and NICHOLE…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Date published: Feb 20, 2013

Citations

CRIMINAL NO. 4:12-CR-00112 (M.D. Pa. Feb. 20, 2013)