From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Warren

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jul 3, 2012
CR. NO. S-09-00121-JAM (E.D. Cal. Jul. 3, 2012)

Opinion

CR. NO. S-09-00121-JAM

07-03-2012

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, PLAINTIFF, v. CHRISTOPHER WARREN, et al., DEFENDANTS.

BENJAMIN WAGNER UNITED STATES ATTORNEY Russell L. Carlberg ASSISTANT UNITED STATES ATTORNEY ATTORNEY FOR THE PLAINTIFF James R. Greiner Attorney for Defendant Christopher Warren


JAMES R. GREINER, ESQ.

CALIFORNIA STATE BAR NUMBER 123357

LAW OFFICES OF JAMES R. GREINER

ATTORNEY FOR DEFENDANT

CHRISTOPHER WARREN

STIPULATION AND

ORDER MODIFYING TWO DATES

OF THE PRE-TRIAL INVESTIGATION

REPORT

The parties to this litigation, the Unites States of America, represented by Assistant United States Attorney Mr. Russell L. Carlberg, and the defendant, Christopher Warren, represented by his attorney, Mr. James R. Greiner, hereby agree and stipulate that two dates of the pre-trial investigation report may be modified by the Court with all other dates, including the judgment and sentencing date of August 7, 2012, remaining the same.

The parties agree, along with probation, that the schedule may be modified as follows:

The pre-sentence report shall be filed with the Court and disclosed to counsel no later than July 10, 2012
Counsel's written objections to the Pre-sentence Report shall be delivered to the Probation Officer and opposing counsel no later than July 3, 2012

Respectfully submitted,

BENJAMIN WAGNER

UNITED STATES ATTORNEY

______________________

Russell L. Carlberg

ASSISTANT UNITED STATES ATTORNEY

ATTORNEY FOR THE PLAINTIFF

______________________

James R. Greiner

Attorney for Defendant

Christopher Warren

ORDER

Based upon the representations of counsel, the record in this case, and the agreements and stipulations between all counsel in the case, and the Court's independent review of the entire case

The Court modifies the pre-investigation report schedule, as agreed to by the parties with no objection from probation, as follows:

The pre-sentence report shall be filed with the Court and disclosed to counsel no later than July 10, 2012
Counsel's written objections to the Pre-sentence Report shall be delivered to the Probation Officer and opposing counsel no later than July 3, 2012

FOR GOOD CAUSE SHOWN, IT IS SO ORDERED.

______________________

JOHN A. MENDEZ

UNITED STATES

DISTRICT COURT JUDGE


Summaries of

United States v. Warren

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jul 3, 2012
CR. NO. S-09-00121-JAM (E.D. Cal. Jul. 3, 2012)
Case details for

United States v. Warren

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, PLAINTIFF, v. CHRISTOPHER WARREN, et al.…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Jul 3, 2012

Citations

CR. NO. S-09-00121-JAM (E.D. Cal. Jul. 3, 2012)