From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Walters

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
Aug 22, 2016
No. 15-10298 (9th Cir. Aug. 22, 2016)

Opinion

No. 15-10298

08-22-2016

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. DONALD WALTERS, Jr., Defendant-Appellant.


NOT FOR PUBLICATION

D.C. No. 2:13-cr-00323-JCM MEMORANDUM Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Nevada
James C. Mahan, District Judge, Presiding Before: O'SCANNLAIN, LEAVY, and CLIFTON, Circuit Judges.

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

Donald Walters, Jr., appeals from the district court's judgment and challenges his guilty-plea convictions and 105-month concurrent sentences for being a felon in possession of firearms, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1). Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), Walters's counsel has filed a brief stating that there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. We have provided Walters the opportunity to file a pro se supplemental brief. No pro se supplemental brief or answering brief has been filed.

Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 80 (1988), discloses no arguable grounds for relief on direct appeal.

Walters's motion for judicial notice and counsel's motion to withdraw are GRANTED.

AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

United States v. Walters

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
Aug 22, 2016
No. 15-10298 (9th Cir. Aug. 22, 2016)
Case details for

United States v. Walters

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. DONALD WALTERS, Jr.…

Court:UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

Date published: Aug 22, 2016

Citations

No. 15-10298 (9th Cir. Aug. 22, 2016)