From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Walls

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
Sep 20, 2012
479 F. App'x 798 (9th Cir. 2012)

Opinion

No. 12-30045 D.C. No. 3:07-cr-00106-RRB

09-20-2012

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. GLENN ALLEN WALLS, II, Defendant - Appellant.


NOT FOR PUBLICATION


MEMORANDUM

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.


Appeal from the United States District Court

for the District of Alaska

Ralph R. Beistline, Chief District Judge, Presiding

Before: WARDLAW, CLIFTON, and N.R. SMITH, Circuit Judges.

Glenn Allen Walls, II, appeals pro se from the district court's order granting his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) motion for reduction of sentence based on the retroactive amendments to the Sentencing Guidelines that lowered penalties for crack cocaine offenses. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

Walls contends that the district court abused its discretion by declining to further reduce his sentence because of his post-sentencing prison disciplinary record. The district court properly considered this information in determining the extent to which it would reduce Walls's sentence. See U.S.S.G. § 1B1.10 cmt. n.1(B); United States v. Lightfoot, 626 F.3d 1092, 1096 (9th Cir. 2010).

AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

United States v. Walls

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
Sep 20, 2012
479 F. App'x 798 (9th Cir. 2012)
Case details for

United States v. Walls

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. GLENN ALLEN WALLS, II…

Court:UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

Date published: Sep 20, 2012

Citations

479 F. App'x 798 (9th Cir. 2012)