From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Walker

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
Mar 9, 2020
No. 19-12382 (11th Cir. Mar. 9, 2020)

Opinion

No. 19-12382

03-09-2020

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. DECOREY WALKER, Defendant-Appellant.


[DO NOT PUBLISH] Non-Argument Calendar D.C. Docket No. 5:17-cr-00027-RH-MJF-4 Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Florida Before WILLIAM PRYOR, ROSENBAUM, and JILL PRYOR, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:

Rachel Seaton, appointed counsel for Decorey Walker in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of Walker and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel's assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel's motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Walker's sentence is AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

United States v. Walker

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
Mar 9, 2020
No. 19-12382 (11th Cir. Mar. 9, 2020)
Case details for

United States v. Walker

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. DECOREY WALKER…

Court:UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

Date published: Mar 9, 2020

Citations

No. 19-12382 (11th Cir. Mar. 9, 2020)