From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Vorrice

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION
Jul 23, 2015
Case No. 06-15736 (E.D. Mich. Jul. 23, 2015)

Opinion

Case No. 06-15736

07-23-2015

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. JOHN VORRICE, Defendant.


U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE R. STEVEN WHALEN ORDER ADOPTING THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION [28]

On April 21, 2015, the Magistrate Judge issued a Report and Recommendation (R&R) [28] recommending that the Court deny as moot Defendant's Request for a Hearing [23], sustain his objection to the writ of garnishment, and vacate the Writ of Continuing Garnishment as to the ELGA Credit Union [22]. No objection to the R&R [28] was filed. The Court has reviewed the record in this case. The R&R [28] of the Magistrate Judge is hereby ADOPTED and is entered as the findings and conclusions of the Court. Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED that the Writ of Continuing Garnishment as to the ELGA Credit Union [22] is VACATED.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendant's Request for a Hearing [23] is DENIED AS MOOT.

SO ORDERED.

s/Arthur J. Tarnow

Arthur J. Tarnow

Senior United States District Judge
Date: July 23, 2015


Summaries of

United States v. Vorrice

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION
Jul 23, 2015
Case No. 06-15736 (E.D. Mich. Jul. 23, 2015)
Case details for

United States v. Vorrice

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. JOHN VORRICE, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

Date published: Jul 23, 2015

Citations

Case No. 06-15736 (E.D. Mich. Jul. 23, 2015)