From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Vogel

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, N.D. California, San Francisco Division
Jan 16, 2007
CR 06-0681 CRB (N.D. Cal. Jan. 16, 2007)

Opinion

          ANN C. MOORMAN (130144), LAW OFFICES OF ANN C. MOORMAN, Ukiah, California, Attorney for Defendant, BRADLEY A. VOGEL.


          STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]. ORDER RESETTING SENTENCING DATE

          CHARLES R. BREYER, District Judge.

         IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED BETWEEN THE PARTIES, Plaintiff, the United States of America, through its counsel, Assistant United States Attorney Julie A. Arbuckle and Defendant Bradley A. Vogel, through his counsel, Ann C. Moorman, Esq. that the sentencing hearing in this case now set for February 7, 2007 shall be re-set for March 21, 2007 at 2:15 p.m. Further time is necessary to complete the pre-sentence investigation. The Probation Officer Cheryl Simone joins in this request and is available on the date indicated.

         IT IS SO STIPULATED:

         ORDER

         GOOD CAUSE HAVING BEEN SHOWN, THE COURT HEREBY ORDERS that the sentencing hearing in this case, now set for February 7, 2007 at 2:15p.m.shall be vacated and re-set for March 21, 2007 at 2:15 p.m.


Summaries of

United States v. Vogel

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, N.D. California, San Francisco Division
Jan 16, 2007
CR 06-0681 CRB (N.D. Cal. Jan. 16, 2007)
Case details for

United States v. Vogel

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA. Plaintiff, v. BRADLEY AARON VOGEL, Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, N.D. California, San Francisco Division

Date published: Jan 16, 2007

Citations

CR 06-0681 CRB (N.D. Cal. Jan. 16, 2007)