From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Villanueva

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Mar 17, 2006
171 F. App'x 633 (9th Cir. 2006)

Opinion

Submitted March 8, 2006.

This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION. (See Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure Rule 36-3)

Debra R. Douglas, Esq., Office of the U.S. Attorney, Oakland, CA, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

George C. Boisseau, Esq., Santa Rosa, CA, for Defendant-Appellant.


Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California, Saundra B. Armstrong, District Judge, Presiding. D.C. No. CR-03-40010-SBA.

Before: CANBY, BEEZER, and KOZINSKI, Circuit Judges.

MEMORANDUM

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

Antonio Villanueva appeals from the 70-month sentence imposed after his guilty plea to illegal reentry following deportation, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a). We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

The record reflects that the district court would have imposed the same sentence had it been aware that the Sentencing Guidelines were advisory. See United States v. Ameline, 409 F.3d 1073, 1083 (9th Cir.2005) (en banc).

AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

United States v. Villanueva

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Mar 17, 2006
171 F. App'x 633 (9th Cir. 2006)
Case details for

United States v. Villanueva

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff--Appellee, v. Antonio VILLANUEVA…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit

Date published: Mar 17, 2006

Citations

171 F. App'x 633 (9th Cir. 2006)