From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Villahermosa

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
May 27, 1969
411 F.2d 599 (9th Cir. 1969)

Opinion

No. 23652.

May 27, 1969.

Conrad Walker, San Diego, Cal., for appellant.

Edwin L. Miller, Jr., U.S. Atty., Brian E. Michaels, Asst. U.S. Atty., San Diego, Cal., for appellee.

Before HAMLEY and BROWNING, Circuit Judges, and POWELL, District Judge.

Honorable Charles L. Powell, United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Washington, sitting by designation.


Defendant's sole point on appeal from his conviction under 21 U.S.C. § 173 is that the trial court improperly permitted the use of evidence of defendant's prior convictions for impeachment. Defendant relies upon the line of cases following Luck v. United States, 121 U.S.App. D.C. 151, 348 F.2d 763 (1965). Since no objection was made to the evidence, its use was not reversible error. Hood v. United States, 125 U.S.App.D.C. 16, 365 F.2d 949, 951 (1966).

Affirmed.


Summaries of

United States v. Villahermosa

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
May 27, 1969
411 F.2d 599 (9th Cir. 1969)
Case details for

United States v. Villahermosa

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Gregorio Victor…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit

Date published: May 27, 1969

Citations

411 F.2d 599 (9th Cir. 1969)

Citing Cases

United States v. Pitts

Petschl v. United States, 369 F.2d 769, 773 (8th Cir. 1966). See also United States v. Ambrose, 483 F.2d 742,…