From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Villa

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Nov 21, 2012
CASE NO. 12CR3812-JM (S.D. Cal. Nov. 21, 2012)

Opinion

CASE NO. 12CR3812-JM

11-21-2012

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. MIGUEL ENRIQUE ARMENTA VILLA, Defendant.


JUDGMENT OF DISMISSAL

IT APPEARING that the defendant is now entitled to be discharged for the reason that: __ an indictment has been filed in another case against the defendant and the Court has granted the motion of the Government for dismissal of this case, without prejudice; or __ the Court has dismissed the case for unnecessary delay; or X the Court has granted the motion of the Government for dismissal, without prejudice; or __ the Court has granted the motion of the defendant for a judgment of acquittal; or __ a jury has been waived, and the Court has found the defendant not guilty; or __ the jury has returned its verdict, finding the defendant not guilty; X of the offense(s) as charged in the Indictment:

21 USC 952, 960 AND 963 - CONSPIRACY TO IMPORT A CONTROLLED SUBSTANCE; 21 USC 952 AND 960 - IMPORTATION OF METHAMPHETAMINE

IT IS THEREFORE ADJUDGED that the defendant is hereby discharged.

_______________

William McCurine, Jr.

U.S. Magistrate Judge


Summaries of

United States v. Villa

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Nov 21, 2012
CASE NO. 12CR3812-JM (S.D. Cal. Nov. 21, 2012)
Case details for

United States v. Villa

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. MIGUEL ENRIQUE ARMENTA VILLA…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Nov 21, 2012

Citations

CASE NO. 12CR3812-JM (S.D. Cal. Nov. 21, 2012)