From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Vernon

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Apr 24, 2018
No. 18-6147 (4th Cir. Apr. 24, 2018)

Opinion

No. 18-6147

04-24-2018

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. MONSTSHO EUGENE VERNON, Defendant - Appellant.

Monstsho Eugene Vernon, Appellant Pro Se.


UNPUBLISHED

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Greenville. Henry M. Herlong, Jr., Senior District Judge. (6:01-cr-00239-HMH-3) Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, and THACKER and HARRIS, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Monstsho Eugene Vernon, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Monstsho Eugene Vernon appeals the district court's text order denying his motion for a sentence reduction pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c) (2012). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm. We also deny Vernon's motion for appointment of counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED


Summaries of

United States v. Vernon

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Apr 24, 2018
No. 18-6147 (4th Cir. Apr. 24, 2018)
Case details for

United States v. Vernon

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. MONSTSHO EUGENE VERNON…

Court:UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

Date published: Apr 24, 2018

Citations

No. 18-6147 (4th Cir. Apr. 24, 2018)