United States v. Verduzco-Rangel

Full title: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. ALEJANDRO VERDUZCO-RANGEL…

Court: United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, S.D. California

Date published: Jan 27, 2015

14-cr-03372-GPC-GT (S.D. Cal. Jan. 27, 2015)

Opinion

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. ALEJANDRO VERDUZCO-RANGEL, Defendant. No. 14-cr-03372-GPC-GT United States District Court, S.D. California. January 27, 2015

          JUDGMENT OF DISMISSAL

          NITA L. STORMES, Magistrate Judge.

         IT APPEARING that the defendant is now entitled to be discharged for the reason that:

         x an indictment has been filed in another case against the defendant and the Court has granted the motion of the Government for dismissal of this case, without prejudice; or

         ___ the Court has dismissed the case for unnecessary delay; or

         ___ the Court has granted the motion of the Government for dismissal, without prejudice; or

         ___ the Court has granted the motion of the defendant for a judgment of acquittal; or

         ___ a jury has been waived, and the Court has found the defendant not guilty; or

         ___ the jury has returned its verdict, finding the defendant not guilty;

         x of the offense (s) as charged in the Indictment/Information: 8:1326(a), (b) - Attempted Reentry of Removed Alien (Felony) _____________________________________________________________________________

         IT IS THEREFORE ADJUDGED that the defendant is hereby discharged.