From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Veney

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Sep 27, 2013
540 F. App'x 176 (4th Cir. 2013)

Opinion

No. 13-6892

2013-09-27

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. IRVING CALVIN VENEY, Defendant - Appellant.

Irving Calvin Veney, Appellant Pro Se. Stephen David Schiller, Assistant United States Attorney, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.


UNPUBLISHED

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. James R. Spencer, District Judge. (3:09-cr-00107-JRS-2) Before NIEMEYER and THACKER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Irving Calvin Veney, Appellant Pro Se. Stephen David Schiller, Assistant United States Attorney, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Irving Calvin Veney appeals the district court's order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006) motion for sentence reduction. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court's order. United States v. Veney, 3:09-cr-00107-JRS-2 (E.D. Va. May 14, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED


Summaries of

United States v. Veney

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Sep 27, 2013
540 F. App'x 176 (4th Cir. 2013)
Case details for

United States v. Veney

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. IRVING CALVIN VENEY…

Court:UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

Date published: Sep 27, 2013

Citations

540 F. App'x 176 (4th Cir. 2013)