From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Venegas

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jan 10, 2012
No. CR-S-06-0441 GEB (E.D. Cal. Jan. 10, 2012)

Opinion

No. CR-S-06-0441 GEB

01-10-2012

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. RICARDO VENEGAS and VIGILIO PINEDA, Defendants.

JOHN R. MANNING Attorney for Defendant Ricardo Venegas DAVID D. FISCHER Attorney for Defendant Vigilio Pineda Benjamin B. Wagner United States Attorney JILL M. THOMAS Assistant U.S. Attorney


JOHN R. MANNING (SBN 220874)

ATTORNEY AT LAW

Attorney for Defendant

RICARDO VENEGAS

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED ORDER] CONTINUING STATUS CONFERENCE


Judge: Honorable Garland E. Burrell, Jr.

IT IS HEREBY stipulated between the United States of America through its undersigned counsel, Jill M. Thomas, Assistant United States Attorney, together with counsel for defendant Ricardo Venegas, John R. Manning, Esq., and counsel for defendant Vigilio Pineda, David D. Fischer, Esq., that the status conference presently set for January 13, 2012 be continued to February 24, 2012, at 9:00 a.m., thus vacating the presently set status conference. Defendants Wendell Stewart and Isauro Jauregui Catalan will remain on calendar.

Further, all of the parties, the United States of America and all of the defendants as stated above, hereby agree and stipulate that the ends of justice served by the granting of such a continuance outweigh the best interests of the public and the defendants in a speedy trial and that time under the Speedy Trial Act should therefore be under meaning of Title 18, United States Code§ 3161(h)(7)(B)(iv) (continuity of counsel/ reasonable time for effective preparation, specifically the continuance is requested to allow more time for defense preparation and possible negotiations for resolution) and Local Code T4, and agree to exclude time from the date of the filing of the order until the date of the status conference, February 24, 2012. IT IS SO STIPULATED.

____________

JOHN R. MANNING

Attorney for Defendant

Ricardo Venegas

_________

DAVID D. FISCHER

Attorney for Defendant

Vigilio Pineda

Benjamin B. Wagner

United States Attorney

by: _________

JILL M. THOMAS

Assistant U.S. Attorney

JOHN R. MANNING (SBN 220874)

ATTORNEY AT LAW

Attorney for Defendant

RICARDO VENEGAS

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff,

v.

RICARDO VENEGAS and VIGILIO PINEDA, Defendants.

No. CR-S-06-0441 GEB

[PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE STATUS CONFERNCE

GOOD CAUSE APPEARING, it is hereby ordered that the January 13, 2012 status conference be continued to February 24, 2012 at 9:00 a.m. I find that the ends of justice warrant an exclusion of time and that the defendant's need for continuity of counsel and reasonable time for effective preparation exceeds the public interest in a trial within 70 days. THEREFORE IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that time be excluded pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(B)(iv) and Local Code T4 from the date of this order to February 24, 2012. IT IS SO ORDERED.

____________

GARLAND E. BURRELL, JR.

United States District Judge


Summaries of

United States v. Venegas

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jan 10, 2012
No. CR-S-06-0441 GEB (E.D. Cal. Jan. 10, 2012)
Case details for

United States v. Venegas

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. RICARDO VENEGAS and VIGILIO…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Jan 10, 2012

Citations

No. CR-S-06-0441 GEB (E.D. Cal. Jan. 10, 2012)