From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Velazquez

United States District Court, District of Nevada
Nov 16, 2022
2:22-CR-90-JAD-NJK (D. Nev. Nov. 16, 2022)

Opinion

2:22-CR-90-JAD-NJK

11-16-2022

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. FRANCISCO IVAN VELAZQUEZ, aka “Francisco Velazquez Ramos,” and aka “Ivan Velazquez,” Defendant.

JASON M. FRIERSON United States Attorney ERIC C. SCHMALE Assistant United States Attorney THOMAS W. FLYNN Trial Attorney United States Department of Justice, Tax Division Western Criminal Enforcement Section Attorneys for the United States JAWARA GRIFFIN Assistant Federal Public Defender Counsel for Defendant Francisco Ivan Velazquez


JASON M. FRIERSON

United States Attorney

ERIC C. SCHMALE

Assistant United States Attorney

THOMAS W. FLYNN

Trial Attorney

United States Department of Justice, Tax Division

Western Criminal Enforcement Section

Attorneys for the United States

JAWARA GRIFFIN

Assistant Federal Public Defender

Counsel for Defendant

Francisco Ivan Velazquez

STIPULATION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER

HONORABLE NANCY J. KOPPE, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and between Jason M. Frierson, United States Attorney, and Eric C. Schmale, Assistant United States Attorney, counsel for the Government, and Jawara Griffin, Assistant Federal Public Defender, counsel for Defendant Francisco Ivan Velazquez, that this Court issue this Protective Order, which (as outlined herein) protects from disclosure to the public any discovery documents containing third-party taxpayer information and other sensitive personal identifying information.

In support of this Stipulation, the parties state and agree as follows:

1. The discovery to be produced in connection with this case contains confidential third-party federal taxpayer information provided by the Internal Revenue Service in accordance with 26 U.S.C. § 6103(i)(2) and being produced in discovery pursuant to 26 U.S.C. § 6103(i)(4)(B).

2. The discovery also contains extensive personal identifying information of third parties, including names, addresses, and bank account information. The release of such information to the public could endanger the privacy of dozens of individuals and also subject them to potential misuse of their identities.

3. Such confidential third-party tax and personal identifying information is collectively referred to here as the “Protected Information.”

4. In order to protect the privacy of the third parties referenced in the discovery, the parties intend to restrict access to Protected Information provided to the defense in discovery to the following individuals: the defendant, attorneys for the defendant, and any personnel that the attorneys for the defendant consider necessary to assist in performing that attorney's duties in the defense of this case, including investigators, paralegals, retained experts, support staff, interpreters, and any other individuals specifically authorized by the Court (collectively, the “Covered Individuals”).

5. The Covered Individuals shall be advised of the Protective Order, and, without leave of Court, the Covered Individuals shall not:

a. use the Protected Information for any purpose other than preparing to defend against the violations in the Indictment, or any superseding indictment or further charges arising out of this case;
b. provide Protected Information to the custody and control of individuals other than Covered Individuals; or
c. publicize any Protected Information, including by attaching any Protected Information to any of the pleadings, briefs, or other court filings except to the extent those pleadings, briefs, or filings are filed under seal and/or have all Protected Information redacted.

6. The Covered Individuals shall be further advised that any violation of this Protective Order may result in sanctions by the Court.

7. Nothing in this stipulation is intended to restrict the parties' use or introduction of the Protected Information as evidence at a hearing or trial, so long as appropriate redactions are made in accordance with LR IC 6-1.

8. The defense shall inform any person to whom disclosure may be made pursuant to this order of the existence and terms of this Court's order.

9. The parties reserve the right to seek to modify the terms of this protective order at a later time pursuant to Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 16(d)(1).

10. In the event of a disclosure of Protected Information in violation of this Protective Order (inadvertent or otherwise), defense counsel will immediately:

a. Notify the person to whom the disclosure was made that it contains Protected Information subject to a Protective Order and request any such material be returned;
b. Make all reasonable efforts to preclude dissemination or use of the Protected Information by the person to whom disclosure was inadvertently made;
c. Notify the government and the Court in a public filing of the existence and nature of any violation of this Protective Order.

ORDER

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

United States v. Velazquez

United States District Court, District of Nevada
Nov 16, 2022
2:22-CR-90-JAD-NJK (D. Nev. Nov. 16, 2022)
Case details for

United States v. Velazquez

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. FRANCISCO IVAN VELAZQUEZ, aka…

Court:United States District Court, District of Nevada

Date published: Nov 16, 2022

Citations

2:22-CR-90-JAD-NJK (D. Nev. Nov. 16, 2022)