From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Vassallo

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jan 20, 2012
No. CR. S-09-179 GEB (E.D. Cal. Jan. 20, 2012)

Opinion

No. CR. S-09-179 GEB

01-20-2012

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. ANTHONY VASSALLO, Defendant.

BRUCE LOCKE (#177787) Moss & Locke Attorneys for ANTHONY VASSALLO


BRUCE LOCKE (#177787)

Moss & Locke

Attorneys for

ANTHONY VASSALLO

STIPULATION AND PROPOSED

ORDER TO CONTINUE THE

STATUS CONFERENCE FROM

JANUARY 20, 2012 TO FEBRUARY

3, 2012 AT 9:00 A.M.

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED between the defendant, Anthony Vassallo, by and through his defense counsel, Bruce Locke, and the United States of America by and through its counsel, Assistant U.S. Attorney Jean Hobler, that the status conference originally scheduled for January 20, 2012 should be continued to February 3, 2012 at 9:00 a.m..

The reason for the continuance is that the Court was unavailable for the status conference originally scheduled for January 20, 2012 and, additionally, the parties are in the process of negotiating to resolve the case without a trial and the defense needs additional time to present additional information to the government and to consider the government's offer. Accordingly, the time between January 20, 2012 and February 3, 2012 should be excluded from the Speedy Trial calculation pursuant to Title 18, United States Code, Section 3161(h)(7)(B)(iv) and Local Code T-4 for defense preparation. The parties stipulate that the ends of justice served by granting this continuance outweigh the best interests of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial. 18 U.S.C. §3161(h)(7)(A). Ms. Hobler has authorized Mr. Locke to sign this pleading for her.

Respectfully submitted,

_________________________

BRUCE LOCKE

Attorney for Anthony Vassallo

Bruce Locke

For JEAN HOBLER

Attorney for the United States

The Court finds, based upon the parties' stipulation, that the ends of justice served by granting this continuance outweigh the interests of the defendant and the public in a speedy trial, and

IT IS SO ORDERED.

_________________________

GARLAND E. BURRELL, JR.

United States District Judge


Summaries of

United States v. Vassallo

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jan 20, 2012
No. CR. S-09-179 GEB (E.D. Cal. Jan. 20, 2012)
Case details for

United States v. Vassallo

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. ANTHONY VASSALLO, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Jan 20, 2012

Citations

No. CR. S-09-179 GEB (E.D. Cal. Jan. 20, 2012)