From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Vasquez-Miranda

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Oct 27, 2011
Case No. 1:11-cr-00242 LJO (E.D. Cal. Oct. 27, 2011)

Opinion

Case No. 1:11-cr-00242 LJO

10-27-2011

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. DANIEL VASQUEZ-MIRANDA and ZOILA VAZQUEZ-VAZQUEZ, Defendants.

BENJAMIN B. WAGNER United States Attorney IAN L. GARRIQUES Assistant U.S. Attorney JEREMY S. KROGER Attorney for Defendant DANIEL VASQUEZ-MIRANDA KATHERINE L. HART Attorney for Defendant ZOILA VAZQUEZ-VAZQUEZ


BENJAMIN B. WAGNER

United States Attorney

IAN L. GARRIQUES

Assistant U.S. Attorney

Attorneys for the

United States of America

STIPULATION TO CONTINUE STATUS CONFERENCE; [PROPOSED] ORDER

Judge: Hon. Lawrence J. O'Neill

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties hereto, and through their respective attorneys of record herein, that the status conference now set for October 28, 2011, may be continued to November 14, 2011, at 1:00 p.m.

The reason for the continuance is to allow for further case preparation, investigation, and plea negotiations. Specifically, the parties reached a tentative oral agreement this afternoon, which needs to be reduced to writing. The continuance is necessary to allow the government to prepare and send a new written offer to defendants and for time for defense counsel to review the revised offers with defendants. The parties stipulate and agree that the interests of justice served by granting this continuance outweigh the best interests of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial and that the delay from the continuance shall be excluded from the calculation of time under the Speedy Trial Act pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §§ 3161(h)(7)(A) and (B)(iv).

Respectfully submitted,

BENJAMIN B. WAGNER

United States Attorney

By: IAN L. GARRIQUES

Assistant U.S. Attorney

By: JEREMY S. KROGER

Attorney for Defendant

DANIEL VASQUEZ-MIRANDA

By: KATHERINE L. HART

Attorney for Defendant

ZOILA VAZQUEZ-VAZQUEZ

ORDER

The intervening period of delay shall be excluded in the interests of justice pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §§ 3161(h)(7)(A) and 3161(h)(7)(B)(iv).

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Lawrence J. O'Neill

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

United States v. Vasquez-Miranda

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Oct 27, 2011
Case No. 1:11-cr-00242 LJO (E.D. Cal. Oct. 27, 2011)
Case details for

United States v. Vasquez-Miranda

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. DANIEL VASQUEZ-MIRANDA and ZOILA…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Oct 27, 2011

Citations

Case No. 1:11-cr-00242 LJO (E.D. Cal. Oct. 27, 2011)