From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Valle-Maciel

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jan 26, 2012
No. 1:10-cr-00054 LJO (E.D. Cal. Jan. 26, 2012)

Opinion

No. 1:10-cr-00054 LJO

01-26-2012

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. BENJAMIN VALLE-MACIEL, Defendant.

DANIEL J. BRODERICK, Bar #89424 Federal Defender CHARLES J. LEE, Bar #221057 Assistant Federal Defender Designated Counsel for Service Attorney for Defendant BENJAMIN VALLE-MACIEL


DANIEL J. BRODERICK, Bar #89424

Federal Defender

CHARLES J. LEE, Bar #221057

Assistant Federal Defender

Designated Counsel for Service

Attorney for Defendant

BENJAMIN VALLE-MACIEL

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO CONTINUE SENTENCING HEARING

DATE: March 12, 2012

TIME: 8:30 A.M.

JUDGE: Hon. Lawrence J. O'Neill

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties hereto through their respective counsel that the status conference in the above-captioned matter now set for February 21, 2012, may be continued to March 12, 2012 at 8:30 A.M.

This continuance is at the request of defense counsel to allow for proper preparation of the sentencing hearing. Defense is in receipt of the draft presentence report and had scheduled a Spanish interpreter in order to meet with client to review the draft and prepare for sentencing. Mr. Valle-Maciel has been housed at the Fresno County Jail during the pendency of the case up until a few days ago. Defense counsel was unaware Mr. Valle-Maciel was transferred to Lerdo until yesterday when I attempted to visit him.

Because of the logistics of the bus transportation from Lerdo, defense counsel will not be able to review the draft PSR with the client until February 8. As such, defense respectfully requests the continued sentencing hearing date, as well as the probationary deadlines to be extended three weeks, so defense can properly prepare and file its papers on this case.

Because this is a sentencing hearing, no exclusion of time is necessary under the Speedy Trial Act.

Respectfully submitted,

BENJAMIN B. WAGNER

United States Attorney

By: ______________

YASHAR NILCHIAN

Special Assistant United States Attorney

Attorney for Plaintiff

DANIEL J. BRODERICK

Federal Defender

By: ______________

CHARLES J. LEE

Assistant Federal Defender

Attorney for Defendant

BENJAMIN VALLE-MACIEL

ORDER

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Lawrence J. O'Neill

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

United States v. Valle-Maciel

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jan 26, 2012
No. 1:10-cr-00054 LJO (E.D. Cal. Jan. 26, 2012)
Case details for

United States v. Valle-Maciel

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. BENJAMIN VALLE-MACIEL, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Jan 26, 2012

Citations

No. 1:10-cr-00054 LJO (E.D. Cal. Jan. 26, 2012)