Opinion
No. 17-2253
06-07-2018
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. ERNEST VALENTINE, a/k/a BOP Earnest Valentine, Appellant
NOT PRECEDENTIAL On Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey
(D.C. No. 2-16-cr-00264-001)
District Judge: Honorable Jose L. Linares Submitted Under Third Circuit L.A.R. 34.1(a)
March 23, 2018 Before: HARDIMAN, BIBAS, and ROTH, Circuit Judges. OPINION HARDIMAN, Circuit Judge.
This disposition is not an opinion of the full Court and pursuant to I.O.P. 5.7 does not constitute binding precedent.
Ernest Valentine appeals the District Court's judgment of sentence, claiming legal error in the calculation of his criminal history. According to Valentine, § 4A1.2(c)(2) of the United States Sentencing Guidelines precluded the District Court from assigning him a criminal history point for his convictions under a New Jersey statute forbidding "loitering for the purpose of illegally using, possessing or selling a controlled substance." N.J. Stat. Ann. § 2C:33-2.1(b). As Valentine acknowledges, we rejected this argument in United States v. Hines, 628 F.3d 101, 109-14 (3d Cir. 2010). Because we—like the District Court—are bound by Hines unless and until it is overturned by the Supreme Court or by this Court sitting en banc, see 3d Cir. I.O.P. 9.1, we will affirm.