Opinion
No. 11-10395 D.C. No. 4:10-cr-01595-RCC
09-19-2012
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. JUAN PEDRO VALDEZ-ROBLES, a.k.a. Jose Luis Ortiz-Hernandez, Defendant - Appellant.
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
MEMORANDUM
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the District of Arizona
Raner C. Collins, District Judge, Presiding
Before: WARDLAW, CLIFTON, and N.R. SMITH, Circuit Judges.
Juan Pedro Valdez-Robles appeals from the 46-month sentence imposed following his guilty-plea conviction for reentry after deportation, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), Valdez-Robles's counsel has filed a brief stating there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. We have provided Valdez-Robles the opportunity to file a pro se supplemental brief. No pro se supplemental brief or answering brief has been filed.
Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 80 (1988), discloses no arguable grounds for relief on direct appeal.
Counsel's motion to withdraw is GRANTED.
AFFIRMED.