From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Valdez

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Jun 11, 2021
1:15-cr-00211-DAD-BAM (E.D. Cal. Jun. 11, 2021)

Opinion

1:15-cr-00211-DAD-BAM

06-11-2021

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. RUBEN VALDEZ, JR., Defendant.


DETENTION ORDER (VIOLATION OF SUPERVISED RELEASE)

JENNIFER L. THURSTON, U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE

The defendant having been arrested for alleged violation(s) of the terms and conditions of his supervised release; and

Having conducted a detention hearing pursuant to Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 32.l(a)(6) and 18 U.S.C. § 3143(a), the Court finds that:

X The defendant has not met defendant's burden of establishing by clear and convincing evidence that defendant is not likely to flee; and/or

X The defendant has not met defendant's burden of establishing by clear and convincing evidence that defendant is not likely to pose a danger to the safety of any other person or the community if released under 18 U.S.C. § 3142(b) or (c).

This finding is based on the reasons stated on the record.


Summaries of

United States v. Valdez

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Jun 11, 2021
1:15-cr-00211-DAD-BAM (E.D. Cal. Jun. 11, 2021)
Case details for

United States v. Valdez

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. RUBEN VALDEZ, JR., Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Jun 11, 2021

Citations

1:15-cr-00211-DAD-BAM (E.D. Cal. Jun. 11, 2021)